InfraFund Co

What the work actually looks like

Most of our clients already run a planning office. What they are missing is a second pair of hands for the technical layer: site visits, capacity numbers, and the paperwork a council will actually read. These are the pieces we hand over during an engagement.

InfraFund Co for clients

Site survey sheets

Coordinates, power availability, access roads, and land tenure for each candidate node. The same format across sites, so a committee can compare them side by side instead of reading three different reports.

InfraFund Co for clients

Capacity model and ring layout

Active strand counts, redundancy choices, and spare duct left for later phases. Built from your current subscribers and a five-year projection, not from a generic template.

InfraFund Co for clients

Technical dossier for approval

Descriptive report, civil works drawings, permits, and a phased schedule with a note on open assumptions. Ordered the way council review actually moves, so it does not come back for missing annexes.

What municipalities, cooperatives, and operators actually get from working with us

Most teams we meet already have a planning department and a rough idea of where the network should go. What they lack is bandwidth for the technical layer: site surveys, capacity numbers, civil works paperwork, and a dossier that survives a council review. That is the gap we fill.

InfraFund Co for clients

  • Field surveys you can hand to a committee

    We walk the candidate sites, log coordinates, check power availability and vehicle access, and note tenure conditions. The output is a comparable matrix, not a single recommendation.

  • Capacity models tied to your real demand

    Current subscribers, five-year projection, and peak traffic per segment. From there we size active fibers, decide which spans can wait, and flag where empty ducts make sense.

  • Civil works and permitting, ordered early

    Easements, trenching permits, and municipal approvals tend to stall projects more than hardware does. We sequence them before equipment orders so the schedule holds.

  • A dossier structured for how councils read

    Context and demand, network design, permits, and a phased schedule with assumptions noted. Each block carries verifiable annexes so reviewers know what still needs confirmation.

  • Phased rollout that matches your budget cycle

    We split deployment into stages with verifiable milestones, so you are not committing full civil works before adoption justifies the next ring.

  • Your team stays in charge

    We do not replace your engineers or planners. We add the specialized analysis they do not have time to produce, and hand it back in a format they can defend.

See how these deliverables map to specific situations on our use cases page, or read about the working approach behind each engagement.

Start with a preliminary evaluation of your project

Send us the site, the demand estimate you already have, and the phase you are in. We come back with a short report: assumptions we had to make, risks we can already see, and the next concrete step. No commitment beyond that first review.

If you are still comparing options, the use cases page shows how similar municipalities and cooperatives scoped their first ring. Our approach explains how field surveys, capacity models, and dossiers fit together before any civil works begin.

One action, one reply. Write to us with the project name and the municipality or cooperative involved.

Request preliminary evaluation

Or reach the team directly at info@infrafundco.com.

Cookie settingsWe use cookies to keep the site reliable, remember basic choices, and understand which pages are useful. You can accept, reject, or review the settings before continuing.